<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Dense-Supervision on Xu'Blog</title><link>https://xuquant.com/tags/dense-supervision/</link><description>Recent content in Dense-Supervision on Xu'Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.152.2</generator><language>zh</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 10:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://xuquant.com/tags/dense-supervision/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Dense Latent Predictive Supervision in AD VLA：为什么 pixel 不是最优</title><link>https://xuquant.com/posts/autonomous-driving/dense-latent-predictive-supervision/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 10:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://xuquant.com/posts/autonomous-driving/dense-latent-predictive-supervision/</guid><description>AD VLA 用 sparse trajectory loss（12 个 waypoint × 2D = 24 scalars）监督 2B+ 参数 backbone，信息论 ratio ~10⁻¹⁰——supervision deficit 是 NAVSIM 87-93 区间停滞的核心原因。DriveVLA-W0 用 pixel-level future image prediction 补，方向对但路线非最优。V-JEPA 风格 latent predictive supervision 在 capacity / 推理 cost / 评测同构性三条上都更友好。</description></item></channel></rss>